Looking at the big picture, should Las Vegas Raiders fans be more patient with Antonio Pierce? He’s a first-year head coach, after all.
Perhaps the situation is more intricate than simply accepting Pierce’s innocence. These are the Raiders we’re talking about, right? However, it’s important to consider the impact of Pierce’s first season and the offseason that preceded it, as well as the current definition of the team. Most Raiders fans will agree that Pierce’s first season has been a disaster, but is it reasonable to demand his firing at this point? That’s a bit irrational—while Pierce’s shortcomings are not to be overlooked, there are factors worth mentioning that might call for everyone, especially Raiders fans, to exhibit some semblance of self-restraint.
The biggest issue plaguing the team well into Week 6 is, of course, the quarterback position. Pierce assured fans throughout the offseason that there would be no more “band-aids.” Unfortunately, that’s exactly what the Raiders got. Somewhere along the line, things changed. It’s possible that once Champ Kelly didn’t get promoted (unlike Pierce) and Tom Telesco came onboard, the aggressiveness at which a trade might’ve manifested was altered. Let’s face it, Telesco’s time with the Chargers isn’t a shining example of “trading up.”
Additionally, the Raiders suffered a setback when they lost out on Josh Jacobs. Just look at the current state; it’s essentially a patchwork of different pieces, but none can carry a load by themselves. It’s a true committee approach, which is ironic since that’s what Josh McDaniels once wanted. In all seriousness, Pierce always spoke highly of Jacobs and his importance to the locker room. Whether you believe Jacobs or Telesco, the miscommunication cost Pierce his reliable tailback.
Then you have the Davante Adams saga, which ties back to the inability to get the right quarterback. We can blame whomever you want; it doesn’t matter at this juncture. Telesco’s inability to maneuver the NFL draft and miss out on free agents such as Sam Darnold or Kirk Cousins, indicates a predetermined outcome. This is simply unacceptable for a player of Adams’ caliber.
Is Raiders HC Antonio Pierce in the same boat as Dan Campbell once was?
Many fans believed that the Raiders, in their current construct, would be competing for wins this season. However, this was misguided, as that’s usually the case for Raider Nation. If you took a step back and looked at the roster objectively, you’d realize there were a plethora of deficiencies. It’s crucial to acknowledge that Pierce inherited a roster that didn’t align with his image or philosophy. McDaniels and even Jon Gruden largely laid this foundation with their picks.
Campbell, to whom many people compare Pierce, experienced a similar situation in Detroit. While he was able to rally the locker room and set the culture for the long term, the team itself lacked talent. You didn’t see results until Year 2, and in case you forgot, the Lions weren’t a playoff team until his third season. By that time, you could see key upgrades had been made across the board—none of that happens instantly.
The point is, maybe fans should quell the unrealistic expectations. It’s difficult for a fanbase that’s known mostly for disappointment, but that’s the reality. If Pierce is fired this season, the team will start anew, and most likely, a new coach will take over and rebuild this roster. If you add another solid draft class by Telesco (see Brock Bowers and Co.) with a reasonable upgrade at quarterback, this team inches closer to 10 wins. Many Raiders fans should abandon their yearning for yearly Super Bowl aspirations; they are currently engaging in toxic self-abuse.
Could we perhaps give Antonio Pierce more than just a few games?
*Top Photo: Darrell Craig Harris, Raiders Today
Consensus From Raiders Fans To Owner Mark Davis: “Sell The Team”
The post Does Patience Need To Be Exercised With Raiders HC Antonio Pierce? appeared first on The Raider Ramble.